Pyro III Licensee Experience

Table of References

I believe it was Feb 2003 when we, the LUNAR Rocketry club, found ourselves at a rocket launch and no Pyro III (Pyrotechnic Operator - Rocketry Class III) on site. So at our semi monthly LUNAR meetings we adopted a motion to commission 5 Pyro III’s. Luckily, our only Pyro III, Joe Heckenbach, attended the meeting and he dropped a hint for us 5 potential Pyro III. “When it comes time to study for your test, you only need to look at the rocketry parts. You can skip all the fireworks stuff.” These were some immortal words I would hold on to dearly.

If you are new to this rocketry stuff, you might be wondering right now, what is a Pyro III? Well, according to the “LAWS AND REGULATIONS FOR TRANSPORTATION, USE AND STORAGE OF FIREWORKS IN CALIFORNIA”

Pyrotechnic Operator--Rockets Third Class may purchase, transport, store, and launch high power rockets. Experimental high power rocket motors may only be imported, exported, and wholesaled by individuals or companies holding valid import, export, or wholesale licenses. Pyrotechnic Operators-- Third Class may only purchase high powered rocket motors from licensed wholesalers. Operators licensed under subsection (b) are also required to obtain a local permit from the authority having jurisdiction prior to all launches.

To simplify this, we have to have Pyro III to fly Experimental High Power rockets. Dare I define this? Sure! I compiled this from a couple of sources and I think it meets the intent of the code book. It’s a rocket that (1) is propelled by one or more high power rocket motors (more than 160 Newton-seconds (36 lb.-seconds) of total impulse or an average thrust greater than 80 N (18 Ibs) or more than 62.5 g (2.2 oz) of propellant,) ; (2) is propelled by a combination of model rocket motors having an installed total impulse of more than 320 N-sec (71.9 Ib-sec); (3) is propelled by a combination of model rocket motors having more than a total of 125 g (4.4 oz) of propellant weight; or (4) weighs more than 1500 g (53 oz) with motor(s) installed. Here is a table I hope makes it easier.

First step, make the call to Sacramento. Debbie handled my call at 916-445-8373. I asked for application material for obtaining a Pyro III license. She sent me “Pyro Technician Certification Instructions”,“Application for Pyro License”, a finger print card, and 5 copies of “Pyro Technician Affidavit” or from the state “Pyro Technician Affidavit.” You have to get the statements and signatures from 5 Pyro III on the Pyro Technician Affidavits.

First stop was my local police station. I walked into Hayward police station and asked to get finger printed. They took $10 from me and asked me to wait. It only took about 10 min for someone to get me and take me behind the bullet proof Plexiglas. When I entered the finger print room, I could see the large round ink disk that I had seen on TV where they inked suspect’s fingers. Hayward police also had a scanner. The police officer escorted me to the scanner and proceeded to scan my fingers. I asked about the relic ink disk behind us. She relied, “We keep that for the people who come in the back door.”

Note: This is specific to anyone currently applying for a Cal Pyro III. As of July 1,2005, the DOJ (and hence the entire state of CA) no longer accepts fingerprint cards. As a result, you must find a "Live Scan" facility (http://caag.state.ca.us/fingerprints/publications/contact.htm for a list) and getting fingerprinted. BTW., the billing code (for the DOJ to bill the OFM) was incorrect on my form. It should be 100089. Take Caroline Fudge's number 916-445-8373 with you when you go to the Live Scan facility. Live Scan is not as ubiquitous as ink fingerprinting, so it may be a bit of a pain to find a facility. Also, the little portable scanners are very new and don't work very well, so be prepared to spend an hour or two getting your fingerprints submitted. It seems to now be around $18.

Next I had to find 5 Pyro III. First one was easy. Joe Hackenbach. Next I scheduled my family for a Fresno launch hoping to get some signatures. We had a fine Easter day launch flying plastic Easter eggs filled with M&Ms. I didn’t get signatures and that’s all I’ll say about that.

Keeping the membership database has its advantages. I looked in the database and found we had 6 Pyro III registered with LUNAR. So I started calling them to see if they’d sign my paperwork. Each one agreed. I filled in all the information on the affidavit so they only had to sign and put their number on it. Two weeks later and I had all 5 signatures.

Armed with 5 affidavits, my finger print card, my application and $87, I sent the whole works to the “CDF/STATE FIRE MARSHAL” and waited to receive my study packet.

At the May LUNAR launch, we didn’t have a Pyro III again. I pointed out one of the people who signed my paperwork. He said, “I’m Certified level III, not a Pyro III.” Oh, boy. One of my signatures was no good. Would the “CDF/STATE FIRE MARSHAL” catch the problem?  A week and a half later, I got my study packet “Laws and Regulations for Transportation, Use and Storage of Fireworks in California” and an “Examination Eligibility Notification” letter. Guess they missed that one of my signatures was not valid.

The instructions on the Examination Eligibility Notification say to call and schedule a test within 30 days of receiving this letter. Swell, I was going on 6 weeks of vacation. There was no chance of me getting this done before I left. I called and they said “No Problem, just give us a call when you get back.”

After returning from a 6,000 mile journey going through Air Museum at Hill AFB Ogden, UT, Iowa, LDRS XXII in Argonia, KS, a Titian II missile silo south of Tucson, AZ and the Tucson, AZ Air and Space museum, I made the call. My test date was the next week, 10am Wednesday Aug 13 in Sacramento. One of two places in the state where you can take the test.

The morning of the test, I dressed in appropriate attire. Dress pants, dress shoes and  “As a matter of a fact, I am a Rocket Scientist” t-shirt. Armed with my GPS, 4 diet A&W Root Beers in a cooler and a bag of Twizzlers (don’t laugh, I already know but I had to keep awake), I was set for my 2-hour drive. I allowed 3 hours for traveling through whatever unknown traffic I was about to face. Fortune smiled on me and I arrived 2-hours after I left. An hour ahead of my test time.

I checked in at the CDF/State Fire Marshals office and they said I could take my test early. 9:15am and I was seated in an office with a 50 true-false question test. Let me warn you that this test is littered with what I would call bad questions. I work in the teaching industry and I’ve had education in question writing. So I have a bit of an unfair advantage. But I’m sure all of you will recognize what is wrong with these questions.

I’ll give you an example. “It is permissible to launch rockets in winds less than 40 mph.” Now is that “True” or “False”? I’ll put the question into terms that we can all understand. “It is legal to drive less than 100mph.” My freeway is posted 65mph. 60mph is legal and that is less than 100mph. So it’s true. But 90 is less than 100mph and that is not legal. So it’s false. The sorry point of this story is that I don’t know which is the correct answer. True or false? I do know that the limit is 20mph winds for flying rockets. There were at least 4 questions of this nature on my test and they sorely irritated me.

Similarly, but easier to answer, was questions like this. “It is permissible to launch rockets at an angle of less than 20 degrees from vertical.” I thought I knew that the limit is 30 degrees, so in all cases less than 20 degrees, this statement remains true. Not so fast though. Part 5 of the study guide says:

“4.17.4 A model rocket shall not be launched at an angle greater than 30 degrees from vertical.”

However, Part 3, Article 18. Experimental High Power Rockets and Motors, section §1036. Launching Facilities says:

“A launch angle of not more than twenty degrees (20E) from the vertical shall be used.”

Swell, which is correct? Fortunately for this question it didn’t matter.

So now it’s time to fulfill my foreshadowing. In the immortal words of my mentor Joe Heckenbach, “When it comes time to study for your test, you only need to look at the rocketry parts. You can skip all the fireworks stuff.” I had studied Part 5, the rocketry parts. It’s essentially a copy of the model rocketry safety code. Now after taking the test and trying to find all the questions I didn’t know, I’m guessing that Part 5 is the model rocketry handbook and has no bearing on California law. Because in Part 2, State Fireworks Regulations, which is from Title 19 of the California Code of Regulations, it quotes Chapter 6, articles 16, 17 and 18 which are all about rockets. You’ll need to study these too. Part 2 has some contradictions to Part 5 and apparently it takes precedence because that is what is on the test.

A big item is the definitions. Part 5 defines:

“3.3.4 High Power Rocket Motor. A rocket motor that has more than 160 N-sec (36 lb-sec) but no more than 40,960 N-sec (9208 lb-sec) of total impulse or an average thrust greater than 80 N (18 lbs) or more than 62.5 g (2.2 oz) of propellant, and that otherwise meets the other requirements set forth in NFPA 1125, Code for the Manufacture of Model Rocket and High Power Rocket Motors.”

While Part 2 defines:

“(4) Experimental High Power Rocket Motor. A State Fire Marshal approved, commercially manufactured rocket propulsion device containing a solid propellant charge wherein all the ingredients are pre-mixed and which produces more than 160 Newton-seconds (36 lb.-seconds) but shall not exceed 10,240 Newton-seconds (2302.2 lb.-seconds) of total impulse.”

The test only uses the language of Experimental High Power Rocket Motor. So this is where we learn about the California M motor (10,240NSec) limit and N (20,480NSec) total impulse. While the Model Rocketry handbook goes to O motors. In addition, a G125 which has less than 160Nsec of impulse is a model rocket motor according to the Model Rocketry handbook but it’s an experimental high power motor according to CA because it’s over 80N of average impulse. Fortunately you don’t have to keep them straight for the test, you only need to know California’s rules. But talking to out of state rocketeers and lead to confusion.

How about High Power Rocket, or in CA lingo Part 2, Article 18 of the manual,

“(3) Experimental High Power Rocket. Non-Professional rockets which are propelled by commercially manufactured high-power solid propellant rocket motors.”

That’s not much of a definition. Does that mean a hybrid rocket motor is not covered in CA? So you can fly an L hybrid with without needing a Pyro III license? I doubt it. In part 5, it says:

“High Power Rocket. A rocket that (1) is propelled by one or more high power rocket motors; (2) is propelled by a combination of model rocket motors having an installed total impulse of more than 320 N-sec (71.9 Ib-sec); (3) is propelled by a combination of model rocket motors having more than a total of 125 g (4.4 oz) of propellant weight; or (4) weighs more than 1500 g (53 oz) with motor(s) installed.”

Now that is a definition! Is California following this? In some ways no,  and it’s not on the test so you don’t have to worry about it.

Additional things that were on the test were:

1. “With proper ventilation can you static test a rocket motor indoors.” No you may not conduct static testing indoors. There were two questions on this worded slightly differently.
   
2. “You may launch rockets with the launch pads within 750, 500 feet of the edge of launch site.” It never says what impulse of motor. So how can you answer this? According to the Model rocketry handbook, 50 feet is fine for A motors. Part 2 lists the smallest site dimension is for H motors and it’s 1500 feet. I guess I got this right because I called both questions false. But I called them false because I knew I could fly A’s at 50 feet.
   
3. “It OK to include a major highway on the edge of the launch site as part of your recovery area.” This didn’t seem very wise so I answered false. I did find it in the book too.
   
4. “Minimum visibility above a launch site is 5,000, 10,000 feet.” What is the answer to this one? I know that we can not fly rockets into clouds. Knowing my rocket only goes to 900 feet, and the clouds are at 2,000 feet. I can fly. So I called both of these answers false. No way to answer without knowing how high the flights were suppose to go. Later I did find that Part 2 specifies 5,000 feet. Yet another contradiction in the book, because Part 5 says do not fly into the clouds.
   
5. “17 year old with out a Pyro III license may purchase Rocket motors.” I still haven’t fully sorted this one out. Part 2, Article 18 says:

   Ҥ1027. Minimum Age

   (a) No model rocket motors shall be sold, given, or delivered to any person under 18 years of age.

   EXCEPTIONS:

   (1) Model rocket motors bearing the standardized coding 1/4A, 1/2A, A, B, C, and D may be sold, given, or delivered to any person 14 years of age or older.

   (2) Persons who are 12 years of age or older and who are taking part in a model rocket education program may receive model rocket motors and launch approved model rockets motors when under the direct supervision and control of a person 18 years of age or older. Model rocket motors must be obtained only from the adult in charge of the launching. Approved model rocket motors for this exception shall bear the motor coding 1/4A, 1/2A, A, B, C or D.”

   While Part 5 says:

   Purchasing or using by persons 17 years old or younger of Type G model rocket motors that do not meet the specifications of 16 CFR 1500.85(8) and (9), “Consumer Product Safety Commission Regulations.”

   Purchasing or using by persons 17 years old or younger of reloadable model rocket motors or motor reloading kits that do not meet the specifications of 16 CFR 1500.85(8) and (9), “Consumer Product Safety Commission Regulations.

   Amazingly, none of this says anything about a Pyro III license. But in Part 2, Article 18 it says :

   Ҥ1033. License Required.

   No person shall possess, receive, transport, store, or launch any experimental high power rocket motor without first securing a valid license as a Pyrotechnic Operator-- Rockets First, Second, or Third Class from the State Fire Marshal. No person shall sell an experimental high power rocket motor to any person unless the seller possesses a valid license as a wholesaler or retailer under this chapter. ”

   So on a test that is about obtaining a Pyro III license with a question that does not mention the type of rocket motor, should you assume it is about an Experimental High Power Rocket Motor? I guess so, so I missed this question.

6. “A Pyro III can sell rocket motors.” This is false, you must have a retailer license.
   
7. “Spectator Restraints are required for a crowd of over 200 people.” I guessed true. Now it’s time to look it up.  Part 2, Article 18 says:

   Ҥ1037. Launch Site Standards

   (g) The launching area shall have appropriate barriers around it such that spectators will be restrained from encroaching upon it. These barriers may be of any type approved by the authority having jurisdiction.”

   This statement is without regard to numbers of people. I assume I got it right.

Disagreements:

1. Table 18A lists minimum distance from launcher for total impulse from 0-320Nsec as 30 feet where as the model rocketry handbook lists 0-30NSec as 15 feet and Over 30Nsec as 30 feet.
   
2. Part 1, Chapter 1, Section 12519 says a model rocket is less than 500g where as the Part 5, Chapter 3, says 453g.

In the end, I passed. 70% is minimum. I got 72%. That means I got 36 of 50 questions correct. I could have missed one more and still passed.

It think this test needs a statement at the beginning that says:

“All the questions in the test are assumed to concern Experimental High Power Rockets and Motors. Answer all questions as it applies to these unless otherwise stated.”

If you have any questions please feel free to contact me in any of the following manners.

Anthony M. Cooper
31120 Chicoine Ave.
Hayward, CA 94544-7432
510-471-3648
Tony@Coopers.org